Passionlife Ministries Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 611688122
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2012, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Roswell, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7702611101
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Religion Related N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $913,232
- Expenses
- $844,248
- Assets
- $673,232
- Liabilities
- $15,560
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN ENSOR (President)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN ENSOR (President): $90,878 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.
What it reported doing in 2020
During the past year, PassionLife designed, produced, manufactured, distributed and presented educational materials related to bio-ethics, pregnancy and fetal health in the provinces of China, Cuba, Vietnam, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Taiwan, Columbia, Peru, Mexico and Nigeria. Using a training for trainer model, PassionLife provided bioethical training to community leaders and practical training in establishing local based, pregnancy crisis intervention services.PassionLife trained 265 pregnancy help organizational leaders across the US in crisis intervention strategies. They in turn, trained their staff and volunteers (approximately 1,800). In China, our intervention teams directly assisted 182 mothers and couples in a pregnancy-related crisis and successfully helped them find the resources needed to have their babies. Another 385 people were equipped to offer intervention services in their local church and neighborhood. In India, Covid-19 forced the suspension of all planned leadership training, though training materials flowed freely using the internet. In Vietnam, in spite of Covid restrictions in the last half of the year, over 1,100 Church leaders were trained in bioethics and crisis intervention. They, in turn, taught approximately 3,200 local church members in crisis intervention counseling and direct outreach to mothers in crisis. In Cuba, 80 volunteers were trained, and they provided pregnancy help services to 375 mothers. In Mexico, 127 pastors and church leaders were equipped to teach bioethics and crisis intervention service to their churches. But the biggest impact this past year was in Colombia. About 210 pastors from Bogota, Medellin and Cali gathered to learn bioethics and crisis intervention and how to rapidly train their church members. They set out to teach an addition 1,100 pastors in bioethics and set a goal that by the end of 2021, they would equip 184,000 people in their communities to help mothers and couples in a pregnancy related crisis. Best reports to date show they have reached about 90,000 people so far. Out of this effort in Colombia, the first pregnancy help medical clinic in Bogota was opened and is now assisting mothers in crisis on a daily basis.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 84% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 83
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.2%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 65.1%; rating input score 65
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.06 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Pass
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.6%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.8; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.2% of revenue deployed · 65.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $550K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $91K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2013 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 17/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.