Passion Impact Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 465118525
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5039124241
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $68,091
- Expenses
- $203,200
- Assets
- $26,700
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEFAN PEIERLS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- ARSH HAQUE (BOARD CHAIR)
- KENYAHTA SIKES (BOARD VICE CHAIR)
- NINA NGUYEN (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We engage with students to foster self-awareness, interpersonal understanding, and social justice through civic leadership.
What it reported doing in 2022
Classroom workshop program: we are pleased to see positive feedback from students gathered in the classroom workshop (cw) evaluations. The workshops have been impactful, with students citing various sessions as meaningful. We observed a sense of belonging and connection to both the school and the community, indicating that the cws successfully fostered these important relationships for many of the students.students overwhelmingly enjoyed their time in the workshops, which is crucial for engagement and active participation. It is encouraging to note that students recognize the significance of volunteering, civic engagement, social justice, and equity workin building a healthier world considering this is core to our mission at passion impact (pi). Additionally, cws positively impacted the students' avid experience while enhancing their engagement with the curriculum and materials. Though many students plan to register for avid again next year and acknowledge that cws could play a role in their decision, students were made aware of pi's pending demise prior to this evaluation. Among the highlights mentioned by students, team collaboration, interactive activities, and the opportunity to contribute to the community were frequently mentioned. These positive experiences demonstrate the value and impact of our cws in creating an engaging and meaningful learning environment. Based on this data, we can confidently conclude that our cws have been successful in promoting a sense of belonging, fostering connections, and enhancing student engagement.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 79% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 83% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.5%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 29.4%; rating input score 29
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -198.4%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.13; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 35% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.4% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.5% of revenue deployed · 29.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $60K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2018 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.