Passaic County Directors of Guidance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
352439657
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Totowa, NJ, USA
Phone
2122926435
Rating
57
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public, Society Benefit N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$28,675
Expenses
$29,635
Assets
$18,472

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TIM CONWAY (President)
  • COLLEEN BROGAN (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • TIM CONWAY (President)
  • COLLEEN BROGAN (Vice President)
  • TAMMY WEISHAUPT (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See attached statement

What it reported doing in 2018

The passaic county directors of guidance fulfills the requirement of reg. 1.501(c)(4)-1(a)(2)(i) by operating exclusivelu for the promotion of social welfare since its primarily engafes in promoting common good and general welfare to the people of passaic county, n.j. As a whole.the organization activities asre as follows: activity #1: college fairto offer an annual college fair at no cost to those high school seniors who are enrolled at various public and private high schools located throughout passaic county, New Jersey. The event provides the following benefit to those students:* students meet with the representatives from the participating colleges and universities. These meetings provide the students with an unique opportunity to learn what each school offers in terms of acadamics, sports, and social life. * students attend seminars and lectures covering topics ranging from college applications, essay writing, and work study programs including financial aid. Activity #2: scholarshipsthe organization offers scholarships to those students who attend high school in passaic county, n.j. Based on financial needs.activity #3: seminars / lecturesto provide invaluable service to the directors and counselors of passaic county, n.j. In the form of education and training, which in turn benefits the students, the parents and the community as a whole.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 41
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 41.6%; rating input score 42
  • Program expense ratio: 40.3%; rating input score 40

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.3%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -10% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 41.6% of revenue deployed · 40.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2013 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 40/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.