Pasco Mental Health Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452407363
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2016
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Port Richey, FL, USA
Phone
7273642582
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,881
Expenses
$9,377
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BONNIE MARTIN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BONNIE MARTIN (PRESIDENT)
  • SHERI LAWRENCE (VICE PRESIDE)
  • CHRISTINE CONTE (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The pasco mental health foundation, inc. Is committed to improving and maintaining the mental health of pasco county residents. We strive to be a resource for pasco residents who need assistance with mental health access, funding, and/or education. We envision reducing the burden that compromised mental health places on employers, community organizations, and the local government. Our work will provide pasco county residents an opportunity to reduce the stigma of mental health treatment, while easing access and utilization of mental health services. This corporation is organized exclusively, as a 501 ( c)(3) with internal revenue including but not limited to: the advancement of charity, education and any other related or corresponding charitable purposes by the distribution of its funds for such purposes.

What it reported doing in 2016

Program expenses are for the opperations of facilities dedicated to the exempt purpose as well as provide funding for mental health wellness education programs primarily benefiting the residents of pasco county.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -398.5%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.5% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -12.9% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2011 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.