Pascagoula Athletic Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
455379224
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Pascagoula, MS, USA
Phone
2287625792
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Reported finances

Revenue
$826
Expenses
$1,699
Assets
$20,564
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DONNIS HARRISON (PRESIDENT)
  • JERRY JACKSON (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DONNIS HARRISON (PRESIDENT)
  • JERRY JACKSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • LANCE MCCARTY (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The foundation is organized for the following purposes: (1.) to work towardimproving all athletic programs within pascagoula high school and colmermiddle school (herienafter "athletic programs") in cooperation with thepascagoula high school athletic department. The needs of the athleticprograms will be identified and the foundation will solicit private andpublic contributions in order to fund the necessary improvements that willprovide each student-athletic with a competitive advantage at the local, district, and state levels. (2.) to create an environmental that promotesexcellence in athletics for the pascagoula high school/middle school. Thisenvironment will encourage student-athletes to compete at the highestlevel, affording each athlete the best opportunity to earn athleticscholarship to schools of higher education.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -105.7%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.1; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -58.9% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.