Pasadera Behavioral Health Network

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
953280475
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2016
Forms available
Form 990 2016
Location
Tucson, AZ, USA
Phone
5208840176
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only

Reported finances

Revenue
$-557,435
Expenses
$2,047,865
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHUCK BURBANK (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • CHUCK BURBANK (CEO): $145,727 total reported compensation
  • JANET WISEMAN (CFO): $89,308 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Pasadera behavioral health network provided pathways to wellness and recovery through accessible and innovative behavioral health services.

What it reported doing in 2016

During the current fiscal year, pasadera behavioral health network wound up its activities and ceased operations. In previous years pasadera behavioral health network provided quality, integrated behavioral health services for children, adolescents, and adults dealing with a mental health or substance use disorder. The following services were provided: intake care and coordination services in tucson and green valley, Arizona, detoxification, residential and inpatient and outpatient substance abuse and behavioral health services and support services to the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 79% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 28
  • Sustainability: 6
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 40.2%; rating input score 40
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: Limited
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -467.4%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.5%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -40.1% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.4% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 40.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $822K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $146K · 14 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $667K reported
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes related organizations
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2009 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 40/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.