Pasadena Rugby Football Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204136374
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Pasadena, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6267939400
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $118,829
- Expenses
- $98,151
- Assets
- $37,216
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PATRICK CANTERBURY (PRESIDENT)
- JOHN MAUST (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PATRICK CANTERBURY (PRESIDENT)
- JOHN MAUST (VICE PRESIDENT)
- EDWARD PATTERSON (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Advancement of the sport of rugby and fostering national and youth rugby competition
What it reported doing in 2024
Youth rugby team that competes throughout southern California, provision of volunteer coaching with emphasis on teamwork, physical fitness and sportsmanship for boys and girls ages eight through eighteen years old who want to participate regardless of ability. Corresponding provision of fields, referees, equipment and administrative support.competition and advancement in national and regional rugby tournaments, provision of rugby rules and historical information for the purpose of advancing the popularity of rugby in the united states.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 78% for direct work, and 22% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.9%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 94.3%; rating input score 94
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.4%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.9% of revenue deployed · 94.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $93K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.