Partnership Reston Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
851660192
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Reston, VA, USA
Phone
7039636871
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Economic Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$50,000
Expenses
$48,703
Assets
$2,828
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARGARET PARKER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • CHARLES KAPUR (INTERIM SECRETARY)
  • CATE FULKERSON (SECRETARY)
  • MARGARET PARKER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Partnership reston is a membership organization of thought leaders invested in reston, committed to continuing the excellence of the past fifty years. The arrival of metro's silver line and the concurrent adoption of a revised reston comprehensive plan have ignited planned, strategic development in reston's dulles corridor. Dozens of land use applications for redevelopment have been approved through fairfax county's entitlement process. Partnership reston is the place where all of the individual project planning comes to life with a focus on integration and seamless delivery.

What it reported doing in 2022

The program is to integrate new development into the greater reston community through meaningful collaboration, strong advocacy, and strategic placemaking.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 60% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.6%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 79.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 66.7% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2020 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.