Partnership for the Delaware Estuary Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510375307
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Wilmington, DE, USA
Phone
3026554990
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Natural Resources Conservation and Protection

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,558,416
Expenses
$4,160,205
Assets
$3,526,669
Liabilities
$826,389

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • KATHY KLEIN (EXECUTIVE DI): $155,595 total reported compensation
  • ELIZABETH HORSEY (DEVELOPMENT): $115,597 total reported compensation
  • MARTHA MAXWELL-DOYLE (PROGRAM DIRE): $115,237 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Partnership for the Delaware estuary, inc. (pde), host of the Delaware estuary program, leads collaborative, science-based efforts to improve the Delaware river and bay, which covers portions of Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania.

What it reported doing in 2024

Living shorelines - pde continued to conduct studies to better understand the freshwater mussel habitat requirements that improve living shoreline designs, and continued to work on living shoreline planning, installation, and monitoring. This included living shoreline monitoring at lewes, de; mispillion, de; and maurice river, nj; as well as on the schuylkill river in philadelphia. Bivalve research and freshwater mussel propagation - pde conducted freshwater mussel genetic research and freshwater mussel growth research at several locations across pa, de, and nj. Pde is also continuing to work toward the start of construction of the freshwater mussel hatchery. Wetlands monitoring and assessment - pde conducted wetlands monitoring and assessment as part of the mid-atlantic coastal wetlands monitoring and assessment (macwa) program. Macwa activities included site specific intensive monitoring (ssim), as well as groundwater monitoring at sites in nj and de to assess the impacts of climate change and sea level rise. The use of newly acquired acoustic monitoring equipment is also being incorporated into monitoring at restoration sites to assess the change in wildlife usage pre- and post-restoration. Public engagement - pde staff engaged in community outreach related to clean water, healthy habitats, and strong communities. Pde participated in an increased the number of public events and festivals in 2024, providing pde with more opportunities to engage with people face-to-face. In addition to in-person events, pde reached communities through various social media platforms and pde's estuary news newsletter. Urban waters federal partnership coordination - pde served as the coordinator of the urban waters federal partnership (uwfp) for the Delaware river location, which includes the cities of philadelphia (pa), chester (pa), camden (nj), and wilmington (de). Pde stengthened connections within each of these communities and worked with community groups to plan community projects that will help improve water quality, habitat, and climate resilience.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 75% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.6%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 74.8%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $27.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.7%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.3%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.6% of revenue deployed · 74.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $156K · 3 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.