Partnership for Strong Communities
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 200882009
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Hartford, CT, USA
- Phone
- 8602440066
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $966,804
- Expenses
- $1,433,810
- Assets
- $3,713,632
- Liabilities
- $126,958
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHELSEA MARIE ROSS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- CHELSEA MARIE ROSS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $148,768 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The partnership promotes equitable change in ct housing policy by coordinating advocacy, advancing research, and uniting diverse partners. We are dedicated to ensuring everyone in ct has a safe, stable home that is affordable to them in an equitable community of their choice.
What it reported doing in 2024
Advancing housing affordability, creation, choice, and stability: the partnership drives change by engaging in policy design, advocacy, building broad coalitions, informing policy with research and data, and shaping public understanding through strategic communications and convenings. Working with partners, we advance systems and policies that create more equitable access to housing for everyone in Connecticut.goals: build public will & advance narrative change; advance housing advocacy & strengthen advocacy infrastructure; conduct and share actionable research.the partnership organizes educational events that increase the knowledge and broaden the base of those who care about housing. We produce an annual series of iforums and webinars that explore the connection between housing policy and various disciplines, including education, environmental quality, transportation, health care, food security, community development, and more. We host an annual Connecticut affordable housing conference where people can learn, share, and collaborate on solutions to expand housing access, equity, and justice in Connecticut. We partner with higher educational institutions as well as produce original research and aggregate research and reports to inform state policymakers, municipal officials, and broader community stakeholders. Our executives and policy and research staff speak at conferences across the state, region, and nation. The Connecticut affordable housing conference (cahc) is our annual opportunity to convene, collaborate, and drive meaningful change to improve and expand housing affordability, creation, choice, and stability across our state. The cahc is a multi-day conference offering a diverse array of sessions tailored to advocates, policymakers, housing and service providers, lenders and funders, and the public. Each year, we spotlight strategies and solutions that help advance the vision that everyone in Connecticut has a safe, stable, affordable home. Cahc content is free to all thanks to our generous sponsors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.1%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 67.3%; rating input score 67
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.62 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -48.3%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.59; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.4%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.1% of revenue deployed · 67.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $965K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $149K · 13 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $151K reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.