Partnership for Science & Technologyinc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204914160
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2016
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Idaho Falls, ID, USA
Phone
2083134166
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Interdisciplinary Research

Reported finances

Revenue
$33,183
Expenses
$28,505
Assets
$27,575

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEPHANIE WALSH (President)
  • MIKE HART (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • STEPHANIE WALSH (President)
  • ROBERT SKINNER (Treasurer)
  • MIKE HART (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

1.enhance public awareness and understanding of science and technology.2.build on and expand pst credibility with regional and national decision makers, opinion leaders and stakeholders.3.promote new missions at the Idaho national laboratory and throughout the region that are in the public interest.4.promote nuclear and other clean energy research and development in support of national energy security.5.promote support and funding for Idaho national laboratory cleanup and research projects.6.raise awareness of the economic benefits of the science, energy, and technology industries in the region.7.participate and provide comments during formal public comment and public outreach initiatives to impact decitions on regional science, energy, and technology activities.8.establish strategic alliances with similar organizations nationally to advance the pst mission and goals.

What it reported doing in 2016

The construction and launch of a website to promote the pst's mission of disseminating information. The continued efforts with in the region to raise awarness and opportunities in science and technology. The strengthening of conections nationaly with other like minded oganizations and leaders.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14.1%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.97; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.9% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.3% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.