Partnership for Results Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 161577978
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Auburn, NY, USA
- Phone
- 3152820005
- Rating
- 35
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Student Services, Organizations of Students
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,143
- Expenses
- $40,591
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CAMILLE JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
- WILLIAM SPECK (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DENISE FARRINGTON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- CAMILLE JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
- WILLIAM SPECK (VICE PRESIDENT)
- KELLY MURPHY (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To foster the healthy development of children in cayuga county from infancy through the age of 21, to integrate services for at-risk children and families among educators, human services and law enforcement agencies and to assist communities in implementing evidence based programs in the areas of education, mental health, alternatives to incarceration, etc.
What it reported doing in 2019
Youth programs are dedicated to promoting community-wide collaborations that foster the healthy development of children from infancy through secondary school. The design is to involve public education, mental health, human services, health, and local law enforcement agencies, who act in close consultation with community stakeholders, including parents, students and community-based organizations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 4
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 9
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 6.5%; rating input score 6
- Program expense ratio: 1.5%; rating input score 1
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -344%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -74.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -76.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 6.5% of revenue deployed · 1.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $591 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.