Partnership for Children of Cumberland County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
561845926
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Fayetteville, NC, USA
Phone
9108679700
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,861,401
Expenses
$14,290,874
Assets
$3,142,076
Liabilities
$353,647

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARY SONNENBERG (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARY SONNENBERG (PRESIDENT): $146,463 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The partnership's mission is to be the driving force to engage partners to achieve lasting positive outcomes for all children, beginning at birth.

What it reported doing in 2024

Health & safety - the family connects program, in conjunction with carolina community collaborative care, served cumberland county eligible births that occurred at cape fear regional medical center. From july 1, 2024 to june 30, 2025, 1,630 families completed the program, which included up to 12 weeks of support, and received newborn home visits. Additionally, 633 participants received baby bundles as incentives for completing the program. Nurses and supporting staff made referrals for services to 453 parents, and 351 used at least one of the service referrals, resulting in a parent use of service rate of 77%.family support - the kaleidoscope play and learn program served 129 children and 93 caregivers through facilitated playgroups in various community settings. In collaboration with the united way, 11,647 children birth through age 5 in cumberland county received monthly age-appropriate books through the dolly parton's imagination library program. Children averaged 44 months in the program from initial enrollment, and bilingual spanish/english books were provided monthly for the first time this year.the partnership provided services to 826 parents/guardians to increase their knowledge in identifying quality child care by providing best practice child care consultation grounded in a parental choice model; 301 parents/guardians received child care referrals. Community collaboration - community engagement outreach had 73 outreach events, 57 community presentations, and participated in 76 external meetings addressing early childhood indicators during fiscal year 2024-2025. The largest community event, little land: big play for families, included over 1,500 children and families. Through the community engagement and development (ced) program, the partnership leveraged 71 community volunteers contributing 659 hours, valued at $20,149.program support, coordination, and evaluation - program management activities included conducting on-site fiscal and programmatic monitoring of all funded projects, as well as the ongoing coordination of projects and activities, to determine if short-term and long-term goals were being achieved. The partnership for children supported 9 in-house and external direct service providers through on-site monitoring visits, planning sessions, in-service consultations, and an intensive support system for several programs. In addition, the partnership supported multiple counties with one or more of the following shared services: multi-partnership accounting and contracting (mac) services, region 5 child care resource and referral, evaluation and monitoring, and information technology services. The partnership's information technology services provided reliable and affordable technology services for early childhood organizations to enhance or improve the services provided to families and children in the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 99% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 73
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.1%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 94.2%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 76.4%; rating input score 76; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 63.2%; rating input score 63; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.1%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 97.1% of revenue deployed · 94.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 19 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $13.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $146K · 20 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $5M reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.