Jewish for Good
Legal name: Partnership for a Jewish Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261443727
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2017
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Durham, NC, United States
- Phone
- 919-354-4936
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1
- Expenses
- $24,982
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LARRY ROCAMORA (CO-PRESIDENT)
- BRYNA RAPP (CO-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ELAINE MARCUS (MEMBER-AT-LARGE)
- PHIL SINGER (MEMBER-AT-LARGE)
- ALLISON OAKES (MEMBER-AT-LARGE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Jewish for Good is a local, community-serving 501(c)(3) nonprofit—everything we do is powered by donors. Its work includes high-impact social services, joyful Jewish connection, inclusive wellness, and lifelong learning. Personal Training Uplevel your workout routine with our nationally certified personal trainers who will listen to your personal goals, provide a physical assessment, and tailor a personal training program that is custom fitted to no one else but you. Unique to our Health & Wellness Center is that our personal trainers hold certifications from the most prestigious national organizations, continue to receive education and training in this industry, and have been part of our team for many years, meaning that our clients get consistent, reliable quality of care met with the highest safety standards. Personal training sessions can happen indoors and onsite inside the...
What it reported doing in 2017
The partnership continued its efforts in the funding of construction and opening of a multipurpose community center to fulfill its mission of fostering community relations and education in the triangle community of North Carolina
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 56.8%; rating input score 57
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2,498,100%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -137.4% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -66.5% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -62.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 56.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2016 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.