Partnership Community Health Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 202090446
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Appleton, WI, USA
- Phone
- 9207317445
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $16,866,820
- Expenses
- $17,512,257
- Assets
- $10,028,051
- Liabilities
- $4,543,467
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
28 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KRISTENE STACKER (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- IRIS TORRES (FAMILY PRACTICE PHYSICIAN): $286,238 total reported compensation
- JAMES FAKLER (DENTIST): $244,989 total reported compensation
- RONALD DUDLEY (FAMILY PRACTICE PHYSICIAN): $239,591 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Making a difference in the lives of people; creating a healthy community
What it reported doing in 2025
Partnership community health center (pchc) is a community-initiated, non-profit organization formed in 1997 as a "free clinic" to provide no cost medical care to uninsured patients. In 2004, pchc was funded as a federally qualified health center and health care for the homeless program under hrsa section 330 funding. Now health center joins nineteen other community health centers in the state of Wisconsin and almost 2,000 centers nationwide.we offer primary care, dental care, and integrated behavioral health services onsite at our facilities in grand chute, wi, primary dental services in oshkosh and waupaca wi, pchc's service area is the tri-county area of calumet, outagamie and winnebago counties and are a federally designated medically underserved area. The mix between urban, suburban, and rural areas creates many unique barriers to care and distinct challenges to our patient populations. This past year 17,442 low-income, high risk patients received care at pchc. We continue to grow to meet the health needs of the area's underserved and impoverished. Our board of directors' priority is improving health access to care for our patients and strategically enrolling all eligible patients in medicaid and new marketplace insurance products.in our service area there are in excess of 100,000 people living at or below 200% of the federal poverty level (fpl). Census data indicates that poverty rates continue to rise in single parent households, with increases in rental properties and subsided housing. Low income families on free and reduced lunch in area school districts are at record levels and new minorities and refugees continue to settle in the area. The demographics have changed dramatically since we opened as a small health center with a focus on homeless, disenfranchised, and mostly uninsured adults. We have now grown to provide care to a large population consisting of medically underserved multicultural families, children, adults, elderly, and the newly insured. Many of these individuals suffer from chronic medical conditions such as diabetes, obesity, hypertension, and other co-morbid conditions due to their historical lack of access to health care as an extension of poverty, no insurance or high deductible insurance, and no income available to cover the costs.data shows that our practice continues to respond to community need.. New dental staff have been hired, and new locations have been opened, to respond to the area's need. 93.3% of pchc patients have incomes 200% or below poverty and 71% lives at or below the poverty level. Pchc provides the necessary primary care and preventive services to individuals that otherwise would not have access to care. We have seen a rapid growth in new immigrants from mexico, central america and asia, recently resettled refugees from the congo, iraq, afghanistan, miramar, cuba, as well as many new patients with complex medical and behavioral health issues that require care management and social support. Pchc is the only fqhc in the area and we partner with our local health systems and county health departments for many services and are the primary safety net provider that offers a sliding fee and care for the uninsured within our tri-county service delivery area.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 72% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.9%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 80.7%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.45; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.9%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.9% of revenue deployed · 80.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $286K · 28 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $242K reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.