Partnership 4 Care Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 853032421
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-PF 2020
- Location
- Coconut Creek, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3479892273
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $198,537
- Expenses
- $198,527
- Assets
- $1,012
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Daniel Kantor (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Crystal L Kantor (Treasurer)
- Elliot J Kantor (Secretary)
- Daniel Kantor (Executive Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Public charity for charitable, scientific and educational purposes.
What it reported doing in 2025
PPMS+ (Patient Partnership 4 MS+). Multiple sclerosis (MS) and related disorders affect more than a million Americans, yet many advocacy groups have close ties to the pharmaceutical industry without always keeping the person with MS+ (pwMS+) at the center. Diagnoses only slightly different than MS are separated out artificially by advocacy organizations and the pharmaceutical industry, but there is strength in numbers, and there is little to no scientific reason for not working together as a larger group of MS+ diagnoses. The first phase of this activity is to raise awareness that #TOGETHERweCanDoBetter as #1MisSion1community, this will be followed by submitting scientific publications to argue for greater partnership among other advocacy organizations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 39.8% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 39.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $199K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.