Partners for Digital Equality Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262555639
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4042620188
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Education N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $-20,024
- Expenses
- $2,077
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- Julius Hollis (Chairman)
- David Rivers (Treasurer)
- Brian Bradford (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Through its diverse array of programs, PDE's mission is to facilitate the availability of broadband technology in order to improve the digital literacy skills of individuals in underserved communities and enable them to be empowered as American Citizens in the 21st Century, digital-based economy. PDE uses innovative approaches to deliver the power of technology and information to underserved individuals, giving the valuable tools for building better lives. PDE helps to bring broadband into schools, community centers and homes of underserved communities by contributing computer technology and providing resources that offer a wealth of information on education, jobs, health care and other vital issues.
What it reported doing in 2015
Organization has been desolved
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -110.4%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -113.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -53.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2012 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.