Partners for Care Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262931776
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2010
- Location
- Alpharetta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7705211016
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,348,799
- Expenses
- $3,930,667
- Assets
- $764,005
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CONNE E CHEREN (President)
People named in this filing
- BRIDGETTE BOYLAN (Director)
- DAVID GRUBER (Director)
- DAVID FISCHER (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To reach and improve the well being of the most vulnerable through computer, sewing, and literacy schools, to ensure all Kenyans have mobility through distribution of mobility carts and adaptive devices, to reduce the incidence and deaths from malaria in a targeted area and to ensure all school children have access to safe water through distribution of WaterSafe backpacks.
What it reported doing in 2024
These funds supported salaries and operating expenses for 32 Kenyan staff members and eight programs across Kenya, from Marsabit in the far northeast to Nairobi, Maai Mahiu in the central region, and Kilifi on the coast.We built 1,000 mobility carts in the country, providing mobility, dignity, and hope to 1,000 men, women, and children, enabling them to attend school, find employment, and participate in church activities. Additionally, we produced and distributed 30,004 bed nets, which protect families from mosquito-borne diseases, including malaria. The Kenya staff distributed 4,052 WaterSafe packs to schools, granting safe water access to 121,560 children throughout Kenya.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.3%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 98.5%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: $95.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 69.2%; rating input score 69; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.6%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.1% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.3% of revenue deployed · 98.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 13 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.