Partner to Decide Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 881950104
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Somerville, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6178505213
- Rating
- 92
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Planning Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $41,248
- Expenses
- $35,197
- Assets
- $37,604
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- Craig Andrade (Director)
- Ann Peralta (Director)
- Yvonne Gomez-Carrion (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
In 2025 the induction of labor decision aid continued to be disseminated across the country. Nearly 7,000 people accessed the induction decision aid on the Partner to Decide website. The American College of Nurse-Midwives endorsed the decision aid in their updated 2025 position statement on induction of labor. Dr. Peralta and Kari Radoff were featured on the Evidence Based Birth podcast and gave talks and presentations to diverse audiences including the national network of perinatal quality collaboratives, medical schools, and birthworker convenings. Partner to Decide established a Community Steering Committee, a diverse group of recently pregnant and postpartum individuals from the greater Boston area. This group met in person in July and then twice virtually in the fall. Dr. Peralta worked with clinical collaborators at Boston Medical Center and the University of Alabama on a new decision aid regarding the choice to have a vaginal birth after cesarean or a repeat cesarean. This work
What it reported doing in 2025
In 2025 the induction of labor decision aid continued to be disseminated across the country. Nearly 7,000 people accessed the induction decision aid on the Partner to Decide website. The American College of Nurse-Midwives endorsed the decision aid in their updated 2025 position statement on induction of labor. Dr. Peralta and Kari Radoff were featured on the Evidence Based Birth podcast and gave talks and presentations to diverse audiences including the national network of perinatal quality collaboratives, medical schools, and birthworker convenings. Partner to Decide established a Community Steering Committee, a diverse group of recently pregnant and postpartum individuals from the greater Boston area. This group met in person in July and then twice virtually in the fall. Dr. Peralta worked with clinical collaborators at Boston Medical Center and the University of Alabama on a new decision aid regarding the choice to have a vaginal birth after cesarean or a repeat cesarean. This work was supported by, and in partnership with the Northern New England Perinatal Quality Network and the Alabama Perinatal Quality Collaborative. This decision aid will officially come out in 2026 but the vast majority of work on it was completed in 2025. Partner to Decide also completed a project for the American College of Nurse Midwives to create patient and midwife facing tools on syphilis testing and treatment in pregnancy.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.9%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 98.3%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.7%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 77.4%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 29.7% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 22.4% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 47% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.9% of revenue deployed · 98.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $35K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.