Parrott Creek Child and Family Services

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
930591772
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Oregon City, OR, USA
Phone
5037224110
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,823,563
Expenses
$5,876,586
Assets
$34,100,075
Liabilities
$7,414,830

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SIMON FULFORD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • SIMON FULFORD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $150,735 total reported compensation
  • WENDY LEAR (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $131,543 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Parrott creek strives to offer person-centered and culturally responsive programs and services to address social determinants of health in our community. Our goal is for all people to experience social, emotional, and physical wellbeing with justice and hope.we deliver our mission by ensuring that parrott creek is a unique, values-based, and empowering place to work. Our programs range from early interventions for children and teenagers to community based services, outpatient treatment, recovery homes and intensive residential care. Over 56 years, we have served more than 30,000 youth and families and currently serve approximately 1,000 families per year in Oregon.

What it reported doing in 2024

Community based programs: outpatient behavioral health treatment programs provided substance use disorder / alcohol and drug treatment and outpatient mental health treatment to 401 adults and youth. Another 44 youth who exhibit sexually inappropriate behavior were served by the lifeguard outpatient program.independent living, recovery housing, recovery support team, steps to active recovery (star), homesafe and housing assistance programs served more than 243 youth, children, and families, providing services and treatment to support mothers in recovery; youth and families experiencing homelessness; and others engaged in substance use treatment services who could use additional support.cultural ecology program focuses on restoring parrott creek's 80 acre site to an ecologically resilient, and culturally responsive and trauma-healing resource for youth, families and the indigenous diaspora community. This project also seeks to reduce many of the barriers that usually exist for indigenous communities when engaging in natural areas, providing a culturally responsive environment, a safe space, and opportunities to mend cultural connections and participate in land stewardship.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 87% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 84% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 21.5%; rating input score 22
  • Program expense ratio: 72.5%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: $48.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 70.4%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.8; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.8%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 27.2% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 21.5% of revenue deployed · 72.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $4.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $151K · 13 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $12.9M reported
  • Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 56/100.