Parmer Paws Animal Outreach Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
871531060
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Friona, TX, USA
Phone
8064183441
Rating
92
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Reported finances

Revenue
$161,247
Expenses
$132,236
Assets
$418,436
Liabilities
$1,755

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAQUELINE PADILLA (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • PAMELA KENDRICK (TREASURER)
  • SUSY VAZQUEZ (VICE-PRESIDE)
  • JAQUELINE PADILLA (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The prevention of cruelty to animals, the relief of suffering among animals, and the extension of humane education and awareness.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2023, we rescued and rehomed approximately 300 animals. We also provided community service opportunities for the friona 8th grade history classes, college students, and people who received tickets for minor offenses. We provided field trips and hands on experiences for the career sciences clss and a local preschool. We hosted a low-cost pet vaccination clinic, built a parade float for our local annual maize days celebration, and particiipated in friona's christmas in the park. We offered transfers for up to eight pets a month to low-cost pet spaying/neutering through the p.e.t.s. Clinic in amarillo, and help fund spay and neuter srvices for parmer county residents at hereford vet clinic.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 73
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.6%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 98.3%; rating input score 98

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.16; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 40.7% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.6% of revenue deployed · 98.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $130K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.