Parmer County Community Hospital
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 750703337
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Friona, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8062502754
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,181,461
- Expenses
- $13,212,324
- Assets
- $14,346,051
- Liabilities
- $1,643,410
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DALE SCHUELER (BOARD PRESIDENT)
- RICKY BARNETT (BOARD VICE PRESIDENT)
- GAYLA QUILLIN (ADMINISTRATOR/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- CONNIE MCCOY (NURSE PRACTITIONER): $298,559 total reported compensation
- AMBER BONDS (NURSE PRACTITIONER): $244,563 total reported compensation
- RENE MCCUTCHEN (NURSE PRACTITIONER): $199,550 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are dedicated to serving the health needs of the people of our area, utilizing the skills of our healthcare family to provide compassionate and effective care.
What it reported doing in 2024
Parmer county community hospital is a 25 bed critical access hospital and an on-campus rural health clinic located in friona, Texas. The organization provides care to patients who meet certain criteria under its charity care policy without charge or at amounts less than its established rates because the organization does not pursue collection of amounts determined to qualify as charity care. They are not reported as revenue. The amounts of charges foregone for services provided under the organization's charity care policy was approximately $1,328,026 for the year ended september 30, 2025. Total direct and indirect cost related to those foregone charges was approximately $1,413,066 at september 30, 2025. Program service accomplishments include: 1 - exercise and fitness program for physical therapy patients 2 - provide access for patients to receive mammograms through harrington cancer center 3 - community education related to various healthcare topics (i.e. Influenza, pneumonia, covid-19, heat stroke) 4 - participate in cancer treatment and education through the parmer county cancer coalition activities 5 - provided children's and senior's health and safety fairs 6 - provided charity care 7 - participate with the ogalala program which allows students who are interested in medical careers to work at parmer medical center while studying for their degree. 8 - the specialty clinic allows patients the opportunity to see a specialist without having to travel long distances for specialized health care (gastroenterologist) 9 - offered free vaccine clinics and free covid-19 home testing kits throughout the year for the surrounding communities 10 - provided free nutritional counseling with our dietitian through the clinic with a provider referral 11 - gave away school supplies with the kids fair. Promoted safety and healthy lifestyle practices and to help with getting ready for school 12 - provided food boxes for needy families during holidays vaccine clinics and education for covid-19 were held weekly 13 - hosted physician assistant students and provide housing and meals during their rotation at the hospital 14 - provided free medicare education and assistance for those about to enroll in medicare or getting ready for retirement 15 - provided four scholarships to local area graduating high school students who are pursuing careers in the medical field
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 88% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.1%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 81.7%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 57.1%; rating input score 57; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.2%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.09; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.4%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.1% of revenue deployed · 81.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $299K · 12 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.7M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 57/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.