Parks & Trails Council of Minnesota
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411450303
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- St Paul, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6517262457
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parks and Playgrounds
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,132,341
- Expenses
- $878,846
- Assets
- $10,082,342
- Liabilities
- $242,100
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRETT FELDMAN (PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- BRETT FELDMAN (PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $155,162 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The parks & trails council of Minnesota exists to acquire, protect and enhance critical lands for the public's use and benefit.
What it reported doing in 2025
Research and public policy: p&tc's research & policy program advances data-driven decision-making that improves the planning, funding, and accessibility of parks and trails across Minnesota. As a trusted, independent source of analysis, the program equips policymakers, partners, and communities with credible research to inform public investments and policy decisions. By connecting research to advocacy, the program helps secure resources, protect access to outdoor recreation, and advance long-term conservation and recreation goals.see schedule o for addtional program language. In 2025, the program translated research and policy expertise into significant state-level impacts for parks and trails. During a challenging legislative session marked by a statewide budget deficit and cuts across government, p&tc's advocacy helped secure $3 million in additional general fund appropriations for state parks over the biennium, protecting critical funding for park operations and access. The program also helped keep state parks affordable by advancing alternatives to proposed fee increases, supported efforts to replace state park land lost in 2024, and secured $2 million for state trail rehabilitation thanks to data gathered through p&tc's research bike. Staff also provided research, testimony, and technical expertise alongside partners to advance trail projects driven by our friends group partners and supported environment and natural resources trust fund (enrtf) appropriations. Together, these efforts helped direct public funding toward maintaining and improving the parks and trails that communities rely on for recreation, health, and connection to the outdoors.finally, as the go to source of information on all things parks and trails, p&tc develops, maintains and updates several fact sheets that are used by decision makers and are accessible in the "our research" page of the "impact" section of our website at www.parksandtrails.org. A more detailed summary of p&tc's legislative accomplishments can also be found in "public investment" page of the "impact" section of our website.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69.1%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 79.2%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.66 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.4%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.47; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.7%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 69.1% of revenue deployed · 79.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $696K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $155K · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.