Parker Senior Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742528815
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Parker, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3038415370
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Senior Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $527,577
- Expenses
- $474,247
- Assets
- $266,113
- Liabilities
- $5,686
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RICH FOERSTER (PRESIDENT)
- TIM CATTRYSSE (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- RICH FOERSTER (PRESIDENT)
- MARIE GLEES (SECRETARY)
- JIM NOON (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We envision a dynamic and inclusive community, focusing on our mission and core values, where older adults can connect, thrive, and enjoy opportunities that stimulate the imagination and present endless possibilities for growth for our members, parker and the surrounding communities.
What it reported doing in 2025
Meals program - provide meals 5 days per week the meals program is the mainstay of parker senior center psc for members and non-members. Our chef plans and prepares nutritious lunches aided by an all- volunteer crew who help prep and serve the meals. Both sit-down and takeout meals are offered. Members enjoy socializing and receiving totally home-made meals consisting of drink, rolls/bread, a well-balanced main course and dessert. Takeout meals provide nutrition for those unable to participate in a sit-down meal. This may be the main meal for some who participate in the meals program and free meals are available for those who need them.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 43
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39.8%; rating input score 40
- Program expense ratio: 44%; rating input score 44
- Fundraising efficiency: $18.82 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.1%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 73.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 39.8% of revenue deployed · 44% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $128K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 44/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.