Parker Presbyterian Sr Housing Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251705428
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Butler, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7242876797
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Senior Citizens' Housing/Retirement Communities
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $213,620
- Expenses
- $190,111
- Assets
- $345,303
- Liabilities
- $1,582,869
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMES B PIEFFER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TODD BOSLAU (TREASURER)
- CELESTE GOLONSKI (SECRETARY)
- CASSANDRA M LAW (ASST SECRETA)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide hud subsidized affordable housing with supportive services for low income seniors who meet the income eligibility requirements of the hud 202 section 8 program. Seniorcare network manages this community and provides or assists in the provision of services to meet individual resident needs. Typically, even though this community is a supportive housing facility, between 50-70% of our residents are considered frail or at risk. To address these issues and the needs of those residing in this community, we employ a service coordinator to work with each resident as appropriate. The service coordinator assesses the needs of each resident and makes referrals to appropriate resources, such as families, senior centers, churches and other community groups. Seniorcare network is an affiliate of presbyterian seniorcare, a not-for- profit, charitable organization established on january 25, 1928 which provides facilities, services and programs for enhancing the quality of life of older adul
What it reported doing in 2024
The community provides affordable supportive housing for seniors who meet the income eligibility requirements of the hud 202 section 8 program. 100% of the approximate 26 residents served daily meet these guidelines. The three most common areas where residents need assistance are transportation, housekeeping, and meals. Other services include social service coordination and other supportive and preventative programs to assist residents to age with choice, such as medication management, bathing, and idl support. In addition, there is also a focus on prevention through education, health screenings, and wellness and activity programs to support the health of the community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.2%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.82; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 4.58; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $190K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D land buildings reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.