Parker Advocacy Group Formerly Central Coast HIVAIDS Services
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 770192226
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Monterey, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8313944747
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- AIDS
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $58,187
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- Jeri Ann Shapiro (Chairperson)
- Karen Rolin (Member)
- Errol Chambless (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Central Coast HIV/AIDS Services' mission is to serve individuals and families living with HIV/AIDS in Monterey and San Benito County by providing safety-net and vital services that assist in maintaining the best possible quality of life while also preventing the continued spread of HIV, through education, prevention and testing programs.
What it reported doing in 2017
Parker Advocacy Group (Formerly known as Central Coast HIV/AIDS Services (CCHAS)is winding down. Remaining cash of approximately $50,000 will be granted to the Community Foundation of Monterey County upon CA Registry Approval.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 4
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 10%; rating input score 10
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -71.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -39.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -32% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 10% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2015 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.