Park Slope Civic Council Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237347301
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7188328227
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $112,036
- Expenses
- $81,246
- Assets
- $188,072
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DONNA STEIN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STEPHEN COPEK (TREASURER)
- TIMOTHY GILLES (MEMBERSHIP S)
- DEBORAH LAUTER (1ST VICE PRE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Community support and improvements
What it reported doing in 2025
The park slope civic council, inc is governed by a board of volunteer trustees that meet ten times a year in open sessions to hear and discuss neighborhood concerns. At a special membership meeting on april 7, 2022, the members adopted amended by-laws. The primary changes from the prior by-laws included: 1) the corporate purposes now align more closely with the organization's current mission statement 2) the officers are no longer elected by the full membership, but rather by the trustees (who themselves are elected by the membership) 3) the roles and responsibilities of officers, trustees and committee chairs are more delineated 4) the procedure approving events, sponsorships and expenditures is defined more explicitly to conform with the prior generally understood, but written, practice. The name of the organization was not changed.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.5%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27.5%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.31; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $81K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.