Park City Senior Citizens Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
852311235
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Park City, UT, USA
Phone
8016132329
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Senior Centers

Reported finances

Revenue
$145,723
Expenses
$104,889
Assets
$207,184
Liabilities
$49,540

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELIZABETH NOVACK (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ELIZABETH NOVACK (PRESIDENT)
  • CHERYL SOSHNIK (VICE PRESIDE)
  • SYBIL ROSCOE (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Park city senior citizens, inc. Provides programs and activities for the well-being of any and all seniors above the age of 60. We advocate for all seniors in our community, promoting diversity, equality and inclusion. Our twice weekly meals program is provided by summit county government and the mountainland association of governments (mag). Summit county also provides administrative services for the three summit county senior centers, personnel to carry out the lunch program, a monthly county-wide senior activity, our 12-passenger bus, and utilities for the building.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provided events including art classess, games, lunches and parties for the citizens of the summit county area aged 60 and over.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 62%; rating input score 62
  • Program expense ratio: 85.3%; rating input score 85

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 28%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.98; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 47.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 41.6% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 62% of revenue deployed · 85.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $89K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.