Parents United of Salem Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262822005
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Salem, MA, USA
Phone
9787457203
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations

Reported finances

Revenue
$22,304
Expenses
$22,883
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SARAH WHEELER-GADDIPATI (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SARAH WHEELER-GADDIPATI (PRESIDENT)
  • EMILY FROESCHL (SECRETARY)
  • MELISSA WILSON (VICE PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Parents united of salem, inc. (puos) is formed to assure that salem, a historical seaside community located on Massachusetts north shore, is a healthy and prosperous place in which to live. Through community service, enrichment, educational programs, recreation rehabilitations, community organizing and advocacy, puos will work to encourage citizens to take an active role in protecting the diverse growth of the city and surroundings. Together with its members and other interested parties, public and private, puos will endeavor to revitalize salems public open space, public commons and playgrounds, to promote the efficient use of such space for long term preservation.

What it reported doing in 2015

To encourage citizens to take an active role in protecting the diverse growth of the city of salem. The organization endeavored to revitalize salems public open space, public commons and playgrounds, and promote the efficient use of such space for long term preservation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.2%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 69.4%; rating input score 69

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.6%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -22.3% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -37.5% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.2% of revenue deployed · 69.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.