Parents and Teachers at Meadows Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742401305
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-T 2020
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6026647600
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $120,446
- Expenses
- $120,924
- Assets
- $126,201
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHARLOTTE SHAFF (PRESIDENT)
- STEPHANIE HENDRIKS (CO-PRESIDENT ELECT)
- AMY HSIUNG (CO-PRESIDENT ELECT)
People named in this filing
- CHARLOTTE SHAFF (PRESIDENT)
- STEPHANIE HENDRIKS (CO-PRESIDENT ELECT)
- AMY HSIUNG (CO-PRESIDENT ELECT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Support students faculty at school
What it reported doing in 2023
Contd - each year the organization also raises funds for purchases outside of the school budget to help offset the out of pocket costs teachers have in order to stock their classrooms.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 95.6%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.4%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.04; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96% of revenue deployed · 95.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $116K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2014 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.