Parenting With Purpose

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411821091
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Brooklyn Park, MN, US
Phone
763-503-2892
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$306,253
Expenses
$279,563
Assets
$233,327
Liabilities
$4,923

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PAUL STRONG (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • LORI STRONG (EXECUTIVE DI): $89,497 total reported compensation
  • PAUL STRONG (PRESIDENT): $77,997 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Building strong families.

What it reported doing in 2025

Accomplishment 2 the mentoring for life change (mlc) program is a one-on-one and group focused program created to break the intergenerational cycle of criminal behavior in youth affected by parental incarceration. Since july 1999, mlc has made inroads in strengthening family relationships; improving or maintaining good behavior and academic progress in school; increased community service and career awareness in the lives of at-risk youth. Mlc program focuses on the expansion of services parenting with purpose (pwp) provides to children and families affected by incarceration. This program is developed in response to a specific inmate need for assistance to restore and strengthen family relationships and to reduce and prevent the cycle of child abuse and neglect in families with an incarcerated parent. This expansion includes more intense services to children and their families. Pwp believes that as a family is strengthened, they will be greater assets to our communities. The strengthening we believe is holistic, including living a healthy lifestyle by maintaining regular check-ups for children and adults, eating healthy, exercising regularly, and learning skills to reduce stress. In addition, parenting with purpose has added a school-based support group for students affected by the incarceration of a loved one. Pwp is currently at park center high school, champlin park high school and osseo area learning ctr. The expected outcomes of mlc program are as follows: to improve relationships with youth of incarcerated parent and their guardian(s). To improve academic and school behavior for program participants. To improve the physical health and emotional well-being of children, youth of incarcerated parents, and their parents by increasing awareness in different areas of their lives. To reduce criminal activity in the children/youth of incarcerated parents. In 2025, the following accomplishments were achieved: 1) weekly support services (rides, support group and home visits) to 54 children, age 5-25, who have or had an incarcerated or released parent. 2) in the lives of the 54 children and teens that are involved in the mlc program, 100% were not involved in any criminal behavior throughout their year involvement with parenting with purpose. 3) 99% of the children who were actively involved with pwp were able to remain in contact with their parents who were incarcerated or released. 4) 96% of the families involved in the mentoring for life change program reported/showed improvement in family relationships 5) 99% of the children and teens regularly involved with pwp have continued to attend school. 95% have shown improvement or maintained their academics or continued good behavior at school.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.8%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 91.8%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: $20.63 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.7%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.83; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 59.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 24.1% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 83.8% of revenue deployed · 91.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $257K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $89K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.