Parent Voices Oakland
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453171972
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Oakland, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5103383049
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Child Day Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,173,228
- Expenses
- $1,122,467
- Assets
- $1,805,508
- Liabilities
- $267,348
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CLARISSA DOUTHARD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- CLARISSA DOUTHARD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $158,415 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Parent voices oakland (pvo), is a parent-led grassroots organization that advocates for affordable, accessible, quality child care. Pvo organizes and empowers families with the highest need to build effective campaigns toward economic and educational justice.
What it reported doing in 2024
Designed, implemented, and refined an innovative community leadership development model focused on redressing infant mortality rates in alameda county.reinstituted our first in-person leadership development training in four years.effectuated a transformative systems change by continuing to fight for a community driven approach to the implementation of measure c since its validation by the courts in april of 2024.secured over $7m in arpa funds to directly benefit 1,600 child care providers throughout alameda county.strengthened our organizing program by hiring an experienced and proven local community organizer as our director of organizing.vision for anti-racist health policy (vfar) national field partner initiativeparent voices oakland participated as a field partner in community change's vision for anti-racist health policy (vfar) program, funded by the robert wood johnson foundation. Activities included contributing local community insights and data to a multi-state policy assessment process; facilitating an ideas lab session with organizational members and community stakeholders to gather input on health equity priorities; collaborating with community change and cornell university on narrative change and message testing research to identify effective strategies for advancing anti-racist health policy; attending two national stakeholder convenings to share learnings and coordinate with partners; and participating in program evaluation activities. The program aimed to develop a comprehensive national vision for anti-racist health policy and a field-building strategy grounded in the lived experiences of directly impacted communities, with a particular focus on advancing health equity for marginalized populations.persons served: directly impacted community members in oakland and the broader California region, as part of a national multi-site initiative.parent voices California (pvca) statewide member engagement and advocacyparent voices oakland served as an independent contractor on behalf of parent voices California (pvca), through fiscal sponsor community partners, to support statewide parent organizing and advocacy efforts. Activities included supporting parent voices oakland members in participating in pvca statewide activities and campaigns; assessing opportunities for organizational engagement in state-level policy and advocacy work; and engaging community partners and resources to elevate both the local oakland chapter and the broader statewide parent voices California network. The work strengthened the connection between grassroots parent organizing at the local level and state-level policy advocacy, amplifying the voices of low-income parents and families in California's policy landscape.persons served: low-income parents and caregivers in oakland and across California engaged in statewide child care, family, and economic justice advocacy.ubi/guaranteed income parent advocacy initiativebananas contracted with parent voices oakland to conduct community organizing and advocacy activities in support of universal basic income and guaranteed income (ubi/gi) policy solutions for low-income families in alameda county. Activities included researching existing funding streams (including arpa and county housing funds) that could support direct income assistance to families; recruiting and training parent leaders from head start and child development center partner sites to participate in public testimony, media engagement, and advocacy through a speakers bureau; and funding community-building and healing justice activities for participating parent leaders. The program aimed to build a sustained base of parent advocates capable of influencing local and county-level policy decisions affecting low-income families with young children.persons served: low-income parents and caregivers of young children in the oakland/alameda county area.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44.3%; rating input score 44
- Program expense ratio: 84.8%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $38.93 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 48.4%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.61; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.1%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 26.3% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 44.3% of revenue deployed · 84.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $952K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $158K · 6 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $117K reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.