Parent to Parent of Ga Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581545706
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7704515484
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,079,006
- Expenses
- $2,118,399
- Assets
- $1,154,198
- Liabilities
- $675,637
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DEBRA S TUCKER (CEO)
- KRISTIE JOHNSON (President)
- TANITRA CARTER (Vice President)
- JAMES BUTLER (PAST PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DEBRA S TUCKER (CEO): $195,039 total reported compensation
- STEPHANIE C MOSS (COO): $145,504 total reported compensation
- SITHABILE A DUBE (CFO): $32,743 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support Georgia families and individuals from birth to twenty-six impacted by disabilities or special health care needs.
What it reported doing in 2024
REGIONAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CENTER (RPTAC)Parent to Parent provides direct assistance to twenty-five other nonprofits across the southeastern United States. Work focuses on increasing centers capacity to manage their work, reach more families and youth impacted by disability and help improve outcomes for children. This technical assistance includes webinars, regional training opportunities, and individualized assistance. It also includes intensive topical work and networking opportunities for these centers to learn from each other. In 2024-2025, we provided trainings for several Board of Directors (Board development, Board recruitment, Board roles, and responsibilities) as well as provided intensive work on human resources, onboarding, and diversifying funding. Topical content offerings included fiscal policies, internal controls, uniform guidance, accessibility, hiring and orientation of new employees, training curricula on various special education topics, use of technology and social media, early childhood/early intervention, data collection and evaluation, grants management and reporting and more. We offered communities of practice focused on the use of social media, self-care and one specifically for Directors who manage smaller centers. We collaborated with the National Center for Parent Information and Resources (CPIR) and the other three Regional PTACs to host a national conference in Denver, CO for Parent Center staff and their Board members from across the nation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 91% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.3%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $199.85 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.9%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.59; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.6%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.3% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $195K · 12 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.