Parent Teacher Organization of Blue Ridge

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
203377652
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Purcellville, VA, USA
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parent/Teacher Group

Reported finances

Revenue
$88,841
Expenses
$89,707
Assets
$50,009

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kathy Coulter (2nd Vice President)
  • Krista Ramey (President)
  • Chris Mallin (1st Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Kathy Coulter (2nd Vice President)
  • Krista Ramey (President)
  • Chris Mallin (1st Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of this 501(c)(3) organization shall be to promote the wellbeing of the students of Blue Ridge Middle School by providing support for their intellectual, physical and social needs and to promote open communication and a working partnership between and among the administration, teachers and parents.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization facilitates a running club which takes place as an after-school program in both fall and spring. A fee to participate is collected by the organization for all participating students, and then a majority of the fee is paid to an independent contractor who coaches the program as well as to provide shirts each student enrolled. Free or reduced entry is available for any student who wishes to participate, but to whom the fee may present a financial hardship. There are close to 85 participants each year. Up to 20% of the participants are given free or reduced entry.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 70% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 63% for direct work, and 37% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.9%; rating input score 60
  • Program expense ratio: 59.4%; rating input score 59

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.9% of revenue deployed · 59.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $53K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.