Parent Teacher Club Fugman Elementary
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201327566
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Fresno, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5593278700
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $116,989
- Expenses
- $137,774
- Assets
- $76,984
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NICOLE PARNAGIAN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- NICOLE PARNAGIAN (PRESIDENT)
- ELISA THOMPSON (VICE PRESIDE)
- MAGGIE PRESSUTTI (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To make a positive difference in every student's educational experience by providing an avenue of participation for the parents of students to work with teachers and staff of the fugman elementary. This is accomplished through grants, events and activities made possible by the volunteers' efforts.
What it reported doing in 2024
Annual marlin carnival & silent auction: each year the ptc hosts its annual fair which is made possible by volunteers, generous sponsors and donations from families and businesses within the community. With an approximate student population of 850 kids at the fugman elementary, the fair draws hundreds of local families around the area. The funds raised by this event are used to award grants to the fugman elementary to support academic & extra curriculur activities, technology and improvements.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 65% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.1%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 82.4%; rating input score 82
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -17.8%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 97.1% of revenue deployed · 82.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $114K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.