Parent Organization of Scholls Heights
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 931275774
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Beaverton, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5033562460
- Rating
- 94
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $97,648
- Expenses
- $91,796
- Assets
- $128,001
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Stacey Andrews (President)
People named in this filing
- Stacey Andrews (President)
- Jennifer Boesche (Treasurer)
- Shannon Webster (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To Provide support and activities to the staff and students
What it reported doing in 2024
Special grants to Teachers - We allow teachers to apply for grants from us for larger items to enhance learning in their classroom such as a Music Classroom Relocation, (3) Lakeshore Art Drying Racks for 2nd Grade, New Chick Incubator for Kindergarten, "One School, One Book" Project & assembly, Sound System for Cafeteria & Gym, 25th Year Commemorative Art Installation Project, Procreate App for Technology, Labeling the Library, (8) Sets of OBOB Books 4th & 5th Grade, 1st Grade White Board Replacement, Classroom Wellness Grant & PE equipment. 624 Students
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 72% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 71% for direct work, and 29% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.9%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 95.3%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.39; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.9% of revenue deployed · 95.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $87K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.