Parent Cooperative Community
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 460593767
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Sacramento, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7079978858
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $189,228
- Expenses
- $343,908
- Assets
- $94,279
- Liabilities
- $145,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOEL DIEFENBACHER resigned (President)
- HELENE MESSINA TIMPONE (CEO)
People named in this filing
- CARLA DEROSE resigned 103124 (Executive Dir.)
- PAUL JELLE resigned 103124 (CFO)
- STACEY COLLETTI resigned (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide the time, space and parenting resources necessary to assist children whose histories of institutionalization, abuse, neglect and/or multiple placements have rendered them unable to benefit from other more traditional community resources. Parent participants will have the opportunity to gain skills and share resources on behalf of their children in order to facilitate the development of bonding, self regulation, competence and good character.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provide temporary housing for emancipated minors, while helping to facilitate long-term housing with the necessary day-to-day supplies.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 51.7%; rating input score 52
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -81.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.54; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 23.5%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 150% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -15.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.9% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94% of revenue deployed · 51.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $178K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.