Parent Advocates for Transformation and Healing

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931371379
IRS 990 coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Weston, FL, USA
Phone
9544464972
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$321,457
Expenses
$362,080
Assets
$26,115
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Allison Schild (President)
  • Christina Romero (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Devin Coleman (Board of Directors)
  • Charetha Parnell (Board of Directors)
  • Allison Schild (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to build critical connections with impacted parents and communities so that we can live in a world free from the family police and collectively dream of a more just future.

What it reported doing in 2025

PATH has been actively engaged in productive meetings, allowing us to gather essential updates and strengthen partnerships with CBOs. Central to our mission is the recognition of the vital role that impacted parents play, and we are committed to their voices being included at all levels. PATH is thrilled to welcome two new members to our board, and collectively, we inspired each other as we reviewed our priorities for 2025 and established a clear, aligned vision for 2026. Through our dedication to relationship-building, PATH successfully secured funding from Sunshine Health to provide mutual aid to families in Broward County. In addition, we've explored new funding avenues during the Agency Capacity Building Committee Meeting, sharing our belief in investing in grassroots organizations to foster the growth of future leaders within our community. Participation in the Change Champion meeting has enabled us to exchange valuable insights. This collaboration has led to the co-creation of key pillars that will take place during pre-service alongside impacted leaders, further reinforcing our commitment to elevating parental involvement. Engaging discussions with FICW, the Court Improvement Innovative, and Equitable Spaces have opened exciting opportunities for partnerships that align with our goal of influencing collaboration with DCF and community-based organizations. PATH took a proactive step by participating in the Peer Specialist and Parent Leader Support Network, where we engaged in valuable discussions and exchanged insights with our peers. This collaborative environment fostered fresh ideas for addressing challenges and enhancing our vital work. We focused on strengthening relationships and emphasized the influential language of system leaders in providing meaningful support to families. To facilitate this, we organized monthly meetings that empowered our members to share their experiences and insights. Together, we identified opportunities within the care portal to improve family support and elevate our roles. Through our collaboration, we developed innovative strategies to enhance the peer space experience and established a dynamic plan for the Peer Specialist and Parent Leader Support Network for 2025. PATH also compiled a comprehensive list of free training resources aimed at empowering parents on their leadership development journeys. Engaging with our members revealed invaluable insights into their expectations and aspirations for the network, guiding us in our continuous improvement efforts.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 64% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 61.3%; rating input score 61; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.6%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 78.6% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -87.9% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $362K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 36 of 38 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.