Parc Center for Disabilities
Legal name: Parc Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 590791038
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- St. Petersburg, Florida, US
- Phone
- (727) 345-9111
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $29,218,623
- Expenses
- $24,132,726
- Assets
- $29,201,807
- Liabilities
- $3,078,536
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELLE DETWEILER (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHELLE DETWEILER (PRESIDENT & CEO): $215,473 total reported compensation
- STACEY RIECHERT (LPN): $166,413 total reported compensation
- MARK CAVANAUGH (TREASURER, EVP & CFO): $163,045 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To make a meaningful difference in the lives of the children and adults we serve.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community employment services: parc provides employment services programs for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Our programs offer a wide range of pre-employment and post-employment programming that allows individuals to gain independence. Individuals learn employability skills, socialization, daily living, and self-advocacy skills in safe, supervised environments.transportation: on a daily basis, parc's fleet of 30 vehicles provides critical doorstep-to-doorstep service to and from our programs. In addition, we also transport individuals to a variety of medical appointments, employment programs, community trips, and a variety of other outside activities. Parc's transportation staff makes close to 1,300 trips monthly, logging more than 170,000 miles every year. Parc is proud to be a designated transportation provider approved by both the mpo of pinellas county and the dot of the state of Florida. Transportation is a key service available to both children and adults participating in parc programs. The service is one of the most comprehensive transportation programs offered by human service agencies in south pinellas county.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 73% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.2%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 81%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.99 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.4%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.21; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.4%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 66.2% of revenue deployed · 81% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $19.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $215K · 25 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $12M reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 35/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.