Paralyzed Veterans of America Southeastern Chapter Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
586055069
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2009
Location
Hephzibah, GA, USA
Phone
7067966301
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$305,110
Expenses
$268,543
Assets
$640,287
Liabilities
$7,672

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LINDA HUTCHINSON (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • HOLLIS BUSH (EXECUTIVE DI): $55,241 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The paralyzed veterans of america, southeastern chapter strives to improve the quality of life of honorably discharged veterans who have spinal cord injury, dysfunction or illness. Through advocacy, medical research, sports and recreation, education and communication. While aiding our veterans in this manner, we are also aiding their families and non-veteran disabled persons living in the states of Alabama, Georgia, north and South Carolina, and Tennessee.

What it reported doing in 2024

The paralyzed of america southeastern chapter (pvase) strives to improve the quality of life of veterans who have suffered from spinal cord injury/disease, multiple sclerosis, and als (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, better known as lou gehrig's disease) and carry out the programs outlined in the paralyzed veterans of america (pva) administrative guide. The chapter holds monthly membership meetings and one general membership meeting annually. These meetings are conducted via zoom from hephzibah, ga. Members from the atlanta, ga, dublin, ga, columbia, sc, charleston, sc, salisbury, nc, asheville, nc and johnson city, tn dial into the meetings. The members are updated and informed on benefits, membership, finances, sports/recreation, government relations and many other issues. We have a question-and-answer period during each meeting. Board of directors meet six times a year via zoom or in-person. Our sports programs are very educational, informative, and encouraging to members. They (members) engage in hunting, tennis, fishing, pickleball, handcycling, golf, billiards and bowling as well as other sports not listed to include virtual activities such as virtual bingo and sports talk. Chapter will send a minimum of 30 members from ga, sc, nc, al and tn to the national veterans wheelchair games (nvwg). The nvwg is sponsored by the veteran's administration (va) and pva. The chapter currently has two full-time employees: executive director and administrative assistant. The chapter has volunteers who assist with events sponsored/hosted by the chapter. The chapter newsletter, "southeastern chronicles" continued to provide valuable, educational, practical information for our members. It is published five times a year to include one annual report. Southeastern chronicles edition sometimes will have an article spotlighting one of our members and how pva has influenced or what influence pva has had on their life. Government relations: national pva & pvase through this program work hard to make sure through advocacy and legislation that our members and disabled community are continuing to get the best care, whether it is medical or barriers. Southeast regional wheelchair games are at clemson university. Rock hill recreation foundation supporting the rock & roll wheelchair tennis classic in rock hill, sc. Walton foundation for independence supporting the walton foundation wheelchair tennis championship in augusta, ga. And richland county wheelchair basketball in columbia, sc.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 65.1%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 72.4%; rating input score 72
  • Fundraising efficiency: $56.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.38; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 20.6%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 65.1% of revenue deployed · 72.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $194K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $55K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.