Papillion-la Vista Trap Team

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463601276
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Papillion, NE, USA
Phone
4025165930
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$69,543
Expenses
$94,358
Assets
$75,544
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEVE CARPER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • STEVE CARPER (PRESIDENT)
  • DARIN FOSTER (PR FUNDRAISING)
  • MINDY BRANNAN (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Form 990-ez, part iii - primary exempt purpose the purpose of this organization is to provide a venue for participation in trap shooting to students in grades 7-12 in the papillion - la vista school district. Shooters are provided opportunities to acquire skills that can be employed.

What it reported doing in 2025

Form 990-ez, part iii, line 28 - first accomplishmenta. Provide opportunities for participation in trap shooting. B. Sponsor member social activities that promoate firearm responsibility & safety and foster team, community, and professional relationships. C. Foster a spirit that promotes and supports trap shooting. D. Provie a means through instruction and coaching for skill acquistion in shotgun shooting sports and venues.e. Promote a spirit of service to others (both school and community) through volunteer projects and activities. F. Encourage and provide opportunities for participation in local, state, and national shoting sports competitive events.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -35.7%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.8; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -16.2% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.