Panthers Fastpitch Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
994213924
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Griffith, IN, USA
Phone
2199021603
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$59,589
Expenses
$32,681
Assets
$26,908

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • William Poe (President)
  • Rebecca Alvarez (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • William Poe (President)
  • Gary Alvarez (Secretary)
  • Rebecca Alvarez (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Panthers Fastpitch Inc. exists to develop youth athletes through competitive travel softball by providing advanced training, skill instruction, and character-building opportunities in a supportive, team-focused environment.

What it reported doing in 2024

Panthers Fastpitch Inc. provides year-round training and development for youth athletes participating in competitive travel softball. The organization offers structured practices, advanced skill instruction, and position-specific training designed to improve player performance and support long-term athletic growth. Panthers Fastpitch competes in regional and national travel tournaments, giving athletes opportunities to face strong competition and gain experience at higher levels of play. The program emphasizes teamwork, discipline, sportsmanship, and confidence-building both on and off the field. To support athletes, Panthers Fastpitch supplies necessary uniforms, equipment, and training resources to ensure safe, consistent, and competitive participation throughout the season.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 54.8%; rating input score 55
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 45.2%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 54.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $33K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.