Panorama Benevolent Fund
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237191166
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Lacey, WA, USA
- Phone
- 3604387556
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Private Independent Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,603,081
- Expenses
- $1,419,203
- Assets
- $16,658,345
- Liabilities
- $2,407
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BOB WATT (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DAVID ANDERSON (VICE PRESIDE)
- DAVE BARTRUFF (CO-TREASURER)
- DEFRANCE CLARKE (CO-TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide financial assistance and social assistance to residents of panorama, a retirement community.
What it reported doing in 2025
This program reimburses panorama, a 501(c)(3) organization, i.d. 94- 3048988, for the salaries and benefits of four social workers who provide services to all independent living residents of panorama, a retirement community. Additionally, the fund contributed 730,544 to panorama to assist panorama with a property purchase and the future construction of a building. The property will be developed into a facility that will be utilized by the fund for its retail fundraising activities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 92
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 49.5%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 84.7%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $444.75 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 60.6%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.74; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 49.5% of revenue deployed · 84.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.