Panhandle Grain and Feed Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
750480525
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2023
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2009
Location
Amarillo, TX, US
Phone
8066550173
Rating
52
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$92,710
Expenses
$46,570
Assets
$143,693

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRANDON DILLER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BRANDON DILLER (PRESIDENT)
  • JOSH HICKS (VICE PRESIDE)
  • RILEY FITE (SECRETARY/TR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We strive to educate and enlighten our members, as well as the public, in all matters pertaining to the grain and feed business; to create confidence of the public in business ethics pertaining to the grain and feed business, and to generally conduct a mutual non-profit association pertaining to the grain, feed, or grain business, with no part of the earning to insure to the benefit of any individual member or shareholder and with no part of the revenues to be paid in dividends except upon a dissolution of the corporation.

What it reported doing in 2023

We strive to educate and enlighten our members, as well as the public, in all matters pertaining to the grain and feed business; to create confidence of the public in business ethics pertaining to the grain and feed business, and to generally conduct a mutual non-profit association pertaining to the grain, feed, or grain business, with no part of the earnings to inure to the benefit of any individual member or shareholder and with no part of the revenues to be paid in dividends except upon a dissolution of the corporation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 25
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 40%; rating input score 40
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 49.8%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.09; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 40.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.7% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 40% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 19 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.