Pando Populus Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472745964
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
3104286406
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Environmental Education and Outdoor Survival Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$377,928
Expenses
$394,185
Assets
$22,750
Liabilities
$92,131

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Eugene Shirley (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Eugene Shirley (President): $112,500 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To create a more sustainable and equitable future through education programs for civic engagement, focusing on Los Angeles County and guided by its sustainability plan the most ambitious regional plan in the country.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, our educational mission remains helping young people do amazing things to create a more sustainable Southland and world by providing the framework and resources needed to get their best ideas out of the classroom and put to work in local communities. We remain an educational organization with a civic engagement focus on sustainability. Our programs primarily target higher ed, with additional focus on K-12 and non-traditional learners. We work in collaboration with NGOs, community and faith based partners, government and public agency officials, and sustainability professionals. Our work remains highly consistent with our founding mission. Our web-based presence (www.pandopopulus.com) remains an active information and education hub; and we continue to have an active social media presence primarily over Facebook. Our newsletter, ROOTBALL, goes out to our community every few weeks with progress updates and involvement solicitations. Our YouTube channel archives our video content.Special Initiatives for 2024 included:- The fifth season of Pando Days, our flagship program bringing together colleges and universities from across the California Southland to help implement Los Angeles County's ambitious social and environmental goals, as articulated in its plan, OurCountyLA.LACounty.gov. Pando Days works at the intersection of higher ed and public agencies for community betterment. The 2024 program saw 21 higher education projects created in courses/studios/labs at institutions across the Southland - including Orange County. The program delivers on-the-ground community impact related to a range of diverse challenges. The program is produced in partnership with LA County's Chief Sustainability Office, in consultation with LA's Chief Sustainability Officer Strategic Taskforce.- Magenta House is our K-12 program on water and power conservation and efficiency for middle schools. The program reached more than 20 middle schools and eventually saw some 15 projects through to the Expo premier (Spring 2024). Magenta House offers extensive curricular resources, including content-related resources such as articles, videos, and special presentations and learning opportunities on water and power; as well as project-development resources such as a brainstorming workshop for project innovation, mentor, and advisor support, project presentation and pitch support and more.- CSO (Chief Sustainability Officer) Strategic Taskforce, a network we have developed serving sustainability professionals from across Los Angeles County representing higher ed, public agencies, NGOs, and business. The Taskforce holds occasional meetings up to three times per year; its members advise on special projects, such as Pando Days (which Taskforce members helped to conceive). In 2024, the Taskforce continued to build on its ouput of useful publications focused on Southland sustainability, under the direction and authorship of noted regional sustainability planner Mark VanderSchaff. The publications are made available free of charge via the Pando website. - Pando's office remains based on the Encino campus of the Sisters of Social Service, a collaborating partner for community development and support.- The Pando Sustainability Awards, an annual showcase of the student- and faculty-based projects developed through Pando Days and any of Pando's project-based learning programs. The Pando Awards is an opportunity to see and honor the on-the-ground, community-based work that Pando teams have developed over the prior season, and to network with an extroardinary group of civic, business, NGO, philanthropic, and other leaders. 2024 marked the third Pando Awards event, the second such event to be held on the campus of Caltech in Pasadena.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 54
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.1%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 73.9%; rating input score 74
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.25 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.3%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 4.05; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 28.5%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.7% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.1% of revenue deployed · 73.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 12 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $291K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $112K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 42/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.