Pandit Jasraj Institute for Music Research Artistry & Appreciation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 113557359
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Colonia, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 6465224300
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Arts Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $95,573
- Expenses
- $113,523
- Assets
- $126,057
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- ANJULA PRASAD (Director)
- TRIPTI MUKHERJEE (PRES/ TRUSTEE)
- HARI NOTT (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See Schedule OEDUCATION: To be premier music institute that educates students for personal as well as professsional enhancement.RESEARCH: To guide students who have a strong interest in music history, inquiry into the theoretical foundations of music theory and variouos genres of vocal and instrumental music.ARTISTRY: To promote creativity and innovation in music. As long as students are committed, we will groom them into becoming fullfledged performing artists. APPRECIATION: To encourage students in perceiving the aesthetic feagures of music. A sense of deep music appreciation unlocks vast treasures of everlasting peace and satisfaction.GURUKUL: This organization is based on traditional Guru Shishya parampar. PJIM is the name of family of each and eery proud member of PJIM. Thus, your Guru's home is your Gurukul, the Mewati Gurukul.
What it reported doing in 2024
To promote and teach Indian Classsical music
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.8%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.11; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.5%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -7.3% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.