Pams Party to Beat Alz Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
455126029
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014, Form 990-N 2012
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,148
Expenses
$27,674
Assets
$13,950
Liabilities
$4,000

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SUSAN MARSHALL (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SUSAN MARSHALL (PRESIDENT)
  • SYDNEY L STEELE (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of pam's party to beat alz, inc. Is to raise awaremess of the devastating affect alzheimer's has on the patient and the family of the alzheimer's patient and to provide assistance to the caregivers who provide the daily care for those individuals suffering from alzheimer's. As a mother, wife and friend, pam provided care to her family and friends and gave generously to her community. Pam's party seeks to continue the model of care pam provided by giving assistance to caregivers of individuals suffering from alzheimer's. Pam's party provides funds to directly to the alzheimer's association of greater indianapolis and joy's house to support their existing programs which include 24 hour alzheimer support line, support groups, and counseling and education services. Future plans for pam's party include providing funding specifically for respite of in home care caregivers of those for families who have a loved one diagnosed with alzheimer's disease and are unable to stay home alo

What it reported doing in 2014

As mentioned in the organization's mission statement pam's party provides funds directly to the joy's house in indianapolis, Indiana. Pam's party made 15,000 in unrestricted payments to joy's house to use for their specific purpose to aid the patient's diagnosed with alzheimer's.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 54.2%; rating input score 54

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -95.6%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -33.2% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -77.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -65.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 54.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2013 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.