Pals for Paws and Purrs Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472023145
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Rockwell, NC, USA
Phone
5594321846
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Reported finances

Revenue
$36,354
Expenses
$39,407
Assets
$305

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CANDACE TERRY (President)
  • KRISTY BROOKS (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • CANDACE TERRY (President)
  • KRISTY BROOKS (Vice President)
  • JANE FELTS (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Pals for paws and purrs is dedicated to controlling the pet overporpulation through education, spaying and neutering, and adoptions, not euthanasia. We believe all animals, as living creatures, deserve to be protected, respected and given every consideration, morally and ethically, and we strive to promote the bond between animals and people to instill an appreciation and respect for all living creatures with whom we share this earth.we will assist animal rescue groups and shelters by providing donations and financial assistance with veterinary care, including vaccinations, spaying and neutering, wellness care, and any additional treatment that is needed for animals that have been abused, mistreated, abaondoned or injured.we will financially assist rescue groups with fees to pull animals from animal control faciliites before they are euthanized for space or illness/injury.we will help facilitate adoptions by searching out and cultivating adoption venues and sanctuaries and to help prov

What it reported doing in 2017

Provide supporting services for animals and animal rescue groups such as medical care, adoption services, spay/neuter services and humane education for the community

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8.4%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 30.2% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 27.5% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -27.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $39K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2014 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.