Palos Verdes Peninsula High School Music Booster Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330473141
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Rolling Hills Estates, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3105416772
- Rating
- 41
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Secondary, High School
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $127,434
- Expenses
- $148,172
- Assets
- $128,745
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- John Diercks (President)
People named in this filing
- Edward Dollard (Treasurer)
- John Diercks (President)
- Stephanie Fleck (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is organized to support and enhance the educational experience of students participating in the school's instrumental music program, including marching band, jazz band, orchestral ensembles, and choirs. Its primary purpose is to provide educational enrichment to students through fundraising and volunteer support. The organization supports concerts, competitions, parade and related activities that benefit students and the community.
What it reported doing in 2024
The orchestra program, consisting of both the Chamber Orchestra and Symphony Orchestra, performed at the Spring Concert and the Pop Concert during the fiscal year. The Pop Concert were held at the approximately 1,000-seat Norris Theatre. The concerts provided meaningful cultural and educational benefits to the community by offering high-quality musical performances, supporting student artistic development, and promoting appreciation of orchestral music among students, families, and the broader public
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 75% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 11
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 11.3%; rating input score 11
- Program expense ratio: 9.7%; rating input score 10
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.3%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.87; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 11.3% of revenue deployed · 9.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 7 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 11/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.