Palos Verdes Intermediate Ptsa

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
330466231
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Palos Verdes Estates, CA, USA
Phone
3105444816
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$81,124
Expenses
$73,218
Assets
$67,124
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNY HANDJIAN (PRESIDENT)
  • CATHERINE XIAO (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
  • RENE HUNTON (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • TAYLOR CHEN (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
  • NIA KONTES (3RD VICE PRESIDENT)
  • AUDREY DIAS (4TH VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JENNY HANDJIAN (PRESIDENT)
  • CATHERINE XIAO (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
  • RENE HUNTON (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Parent and student education

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization serves approximately 750 students and their parents. It provides field trips and buses, library subscription, teacher supplies, teacher appreciation, drug awareness, math fees for competition, gifting, pe equipment, books, music equipment, technology, all pro dads program, disaster/safety supplies, garden program and classroom lab supplies.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.1%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 85.4%; rating input score 85

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.7%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.92; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.1% of revenue deployed · 85.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $63K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.